Why did the European Union fine Facebook's Meta a record $1.3 billion?

A record fine
Largest since Amazon
Data investigation
Data transfer
Facebook's reaction
What kind of data?
Financial hit
Data privacy and security
A long battle
Snowden
2020 court case
US laws vs. EU laws
A pending deal
Some parties are skeptical
A record fine

The European Union (EU) fined Facebook's parent company Meta $1.3 billion (1.2 billion Euros) and ordered the company to stop transferring European users' data to American servers.

Largest since Amazon

The fine is the largest ever charged under the General Data Protection Regulation, well above 2021's Amazon $746 million fee, according to Fox Business.

Data investigation

The news outlet explains that the punishment came after an investigation by Ireland's Data Protection Commission, the lead data regulator for the EU.

Data transfer

The investigation showed that Facebook continued to transfer data from European users to US servers after a 2020 court order prohibiting it.

Facebook's reaction

Meta said it would challenge the fine, calling it "flawed and unjustified," according to company declarations collected by The Associated Press (AP).

What kind of data?

According to The New York Times, the fine could refer to data related to photos, friend connections, and direct messages stored by the company.

Financial hit

Those restrictions could financially affect Meta's advertisement business by hurting the company's ability to target Facebook ads to specific audiences.

"Silos"

Mark Zuckerberg's company said in a statement, as recounted by Fox Business, that "without the ability to transfer data across borders," the internet risks becoming "national and regional silos."

Data privacy and security

However, the free-moving tendency that data used to follow is changing. According to The New York Times, companies are increasingly asked to store data within the country it is collected from.

A long battle

The European case relates to a long-standing battle by internet activists to protect users' privacy from American intelligence agencies and surveillance services.

Snowden

After Edward Snowden leaked information about the National Security Agency's surveillance of citizens, Austrian activist Max Schrems sued to invalidate an EU-US data-sharing agreement.

2020 court case

In 2020, the EU's highest court sided with Schrems and declared the agreement null. According to the AP, the court said it didn't do enough to protect residents from American spy agencies.

US laws vs. EU laws

The AP qualifies the incident as a clash between the EU's strict view on data privacy and the comparatively lax perception of the US Government, which lacks a Federal data protection law.

A pending deal

In any case, Meta's fine could prescribe soon as both power players reach a new agreement to allow data flow from Europe to the US.

"Unprecedented protection"

Discussions took place at the beginning of 2023. According to The New York Times, President Biden believes the new deal will bring "unprecedented protections for data privacy and security" to Americans.

Some parties are skeptical

However, some counterparts are more skeptical. "If it is not in line with EU law, we or another group will likely challenge it," the Austrian activist Max Schrem said in a statement.

More for you