Some experts believe our universe is a Matrix-like simulation

Do you take the blue pill or the red pill?
‘The simulation hypothesis’
An old philosophical question
“I think, therefore I am”
Simulated by a “post human” civilization?
The founder of MIT’s PlayLabs
Losing track of reality
NASA’s computer scientist Rich Terrile
Could AI develop consciousness?
Evidence that we could be living in a simulation
All physical objects can be reduced to particles
Everything we see as physical is the result of bits of information
The theory is possible from a physics perspective
“An extraordinarily unlikely circumstance”
Abundant artificial simulations
We may be part of that already
Others that take an interest in the ‘simulation hypothesis’
Are billionaires paying scientists to break us out of the simulation?
Glitches in The Matrix
Some experts are skeptical about the simulation theory
Our world is full of mysteries
Do you take the blue pill or the red pill?

The movie ‘The Matrix’ popularized the idea that our universe is simulated. But, is it? You take the blue pill, you close this browser and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you go through this gallery and it’ll show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

‘The simulation hypothesis’
The idea of a simulated universe is not just a part of pop culture, but of the scientific world too; it’s called ‘the simulation hypothesis’ and many experts argue that the theory is more likely to be the case than not.
An old philosophical question
But although the theory has re-emerged recently, it’s been around for hundreds of years. In fact, one of the oldest questions in philosophy is: how do we know that anything exists?
“I think, therefore I am”

French philosopher René Descartes said: “I think, therefore I am”, expressing that we could only be aware of our own consciousness, not knowing if a world outside our minds is real.

Simulated by a “post human” civilization?

But in the present day, one popular argument for the simulation hypothesis came from Oxford University’s Nick Bostrom in 2003 who suggested that members of an advanced “posthuman” civilization with vast computing power might choose to run simulations of their ancestors in the universe.

The founder of MIT’s PlayLabs

Similarly, Rizwan Virk, founder of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s PlayLabs program and author of "The Simulation Hypothesis," is among those who take the simulation theory seriously.

Losing track of reality

In his book, Virk recalls playing a virtual reality game so realistic that he forgot that he was in an empty room with a headset on. That led him to wonder: Are we sure we aren’t embedded within a world created by beings more technologically savvy than ourselves?

NASA’s computer scientist Rich Terrile

That question also makes sense to Rich Terrile, a computer scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, who argues that the ability to model sentient beings could soon be within our grasp.

Could AI develop consciousness?

“We are within a generation of being those gods who create those universes,” Terrile said in 2019, according to ‘The Guardian’. A few years later, tech experts are already discussing the possibility of AI becoming conscious and the ethical implications that could entail.

Evidence that we could be living in a simulation

But besides the huge advances in technology that we’ve made in recent years and the not-so-far-fetch idea of being able to simulate a human brain, what other evidence is there that we could be living in a Matrix-like simulation?

All physical objects can be reduced to particles

Rizwan Virk, computer scientist and video game designer said in an interview with ‘Vox’ that a piece of evidence that points to this world being a simulation is the fact that all physical objects can be reduced to particles, much like pixels that compose an image.

Everything we see as physical is the result of bits of information

Virk mentioned physicist John Wheeler, one of the last scientists to work with Einstein who came up with the phrase “it for bit”, meaning that anything we see as physical is really the result of bits of information.

The theory is possible from a physics perspective

Although Wheeler didn’t live to see quantum computers, Virk considers his theory fitting. “If the world isn’t really physical but based on information, then a simpler explanation might in fact be that we are in a simulation that is generated based on computer science and information”, he said.

“An extraordinarily unlikely circumstance”

Similarly, NASA’s computer scientist Rich Terrile said that “quite frankly, if we are not living in a simulation, it is an extraordinarily unlikely circumstance,” ‘The Guardian’ reported.

Abundant artificial simulations

“If one progresses at the current rate of technology a few decades into the future, very quickly we will be a society where there are artificial entities living in simulations that are much more abundant than human beings,” Terrile said.

Photo : Gerd Altmann / Pixabay

We may be part of that already

“If in the future there are more digital people living in simulated environments than there are today, then what is to say we are not part of that already?,” the computer scientist asked.

Others that take an interest in the ‘simulation hypothesis’

There is also a group of Silicon Valley tech experts who have taken an interest in ‘the simulation hypothesis’, such as Tesla’s creator Elon Musk, who has said that there’s “a billion to one chance we’re living in base reality,” according to ‘The Guardian’.

Are billionaires paying scientists to break us out of the simulation?

In fact, Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI, told The New Yorker in 2016 that two tech billionaires were “secretly engaging scientists to work on breaking us out of the simulation.”

Glitches in The Matrix

Rich tech guys and scientists theories aside, there are several online forums, such as Reddit that are flooded with people’s testimonies of what they call “a glitch in the Matrix”; surreal experiences that have made them believe they are actually living in a simulated world.

Some experts are skeptical about the simulation theory

But of course, there are experts that are more skeptical about the simulation theory. “Is it logically possible that we are in a simulation? Yes. Are we probably in a simulation? I would say no,” said Max Tegmark, a professor of physics at MIT to ‘The Guardian’.

Our world is full of mysteries

Others, like Harvard theoretical physicist Lisa Randall say there’s no “real evidence” that points to our world being a simulation. But one thing most experts can agree on however, is the fact that there are still lots of mysteries in the physical world and a lot we don’t understand about our reality.

Never miss a story! Click here to follow The Daily Digest.

More for you