Did Trump commit tax fraud? New evidence suggests its possible

Court monitor reveals problems with the Trump Organization
Judge Barbara Jones and Trump’s New York civil fraud case
Incomplete disclosures and inconsistent results
A mysterious loan that may not have ever existed
Was the loan a tax avoidance strategy?
Comments from Judge Jones in her letter
The Trump Organization said the loan didn’t exist
There could be big consequences for Trump
The Trump Organization says the claims are inaccurate
“One of many inaccuracies contained in the monitor’s letter”
Trump’s lawyer hit back at the claims from Judge Jones
Clearing up the Trump Organization’s position
The claim casts doubt doubt of Judge Jones
Accusing Judge Jones justifying her fees
Trump mystery loan has been in the news before
“I have the mortgage… I am the bank”
Court monitor reveals problems with the Trump Organization

On January 26th, the special monitor appointed by Manhattan Supreme Justice Arthur Engoron to oversee Donald Trump’s businesses told the judge in a 12-page letter that the former president’s financial information had a lot of problems. 

Judge Barbara Jones and Trump’s New York civil fraud case

Judge Barabra Jones was tasked with watching over the Trump Organization and digging into the complicated details of the former president’s business empire, and Jones' latest report indicated she had “identified certain deficiencies in the financial information” according to her letter to Engoron. 

Incomplete disclosures and inconsistent results

The deficiencies discovered by Judge Jones included what she wrote were “disclosures that are either incomplete, present results inconsistently, and/or contain errors.” But that wasn’t where the former president’s problems ended. 

A mysterious loan that may not have ever existed

A footnote midway through the letter seemed to reveal that Trump claimed to owe an enormous debt to himself, one that did not exist, and may not have ever existed according to reporting from The Daily Beast. So what do we know about the debt?

Was the loan a tax avoidance strategy?

Trump may have avoided taxes on $48 million dollars in income, a sum that he has said for years was what he owed as a debt to one of his companies according to an analysis of information from Business Insider that was cited by Judge Jones' letter. 

Comments from Judge Jones in her letter

“When I inquired about this loan, I was informed that there are no loan agreements that memorialize the loan, but that it was a loan that was believed to be between Donald J. Trump, individually, and Chicago Unit Acquisition for $48 million," Judge Jones wrote.

The Trump Organization said the loan didn’t exist

“However, in recent discussions with the Trump Organization, it indicated that it has determined that this loan never existed—and thus that it would be removed from any upcoming forms submitted to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and would also be removed from subsequent versions of [corporate financial statements],” Jones added.

There could be big consequences for Trump

The Daily Beast’s Roger Sollenberger noted that if what Judge Jones discovered turns out to be true, it would mean the Trump Organization “essentially admitted” that all of the financial disclosures filed by Trump with the federal government listed a fake debt. 

The Trump Organization says the claims are inaccurate

Trump Organization Chief Legal Counsel Alan Garten has challenged the claim made by Judge Jones and told the Daily Beast during a telephone interview that the comment from the monitor in her letter to Judge Engoron about the loan was inaccurate.

“One of many inaccuracies contained in the monitor’s letter”

Garten explained that the loan issue of the multi-million dollar loan was “one of many inaccuracies contained in the monitor’s letter” and added that it would be addressed in court. Trump’s personal lawyer also claimed Judge Jones’ conclusion was wrong. 

Trump’s lawyer hit back at the claims from Judge Jones

“That the monitor seeks to now perpetuate this folly is beyond the pale,” Clifford Robert wrote in a court filing according to a separate report from The Daily Beast. “The Trump entities of course never said the loan did not exist.”

Clearing up the Trump Organization’s position

Robert explained that the Trump Organization had sent a copy of an internal company memorandum that said the business had “‘no liabilities or obligations outstanding’ to the loan at that time” before going on to attack Judge Jones. 

The claim casts doubt doubt of Judge Jones

“The Monitor’s deliberate mischaracterization casts further doubt on her competency and veracity,” Robert continued in his letter. “This is yet another nonissue and material misstatement by the Monitor and simply fails to support continued oversight.”

Accusing Judge Jones justifying her fees

Trump’s lawyer also accused Jones of “desperately” seeking “to justify the continued receipt of millions of dollars in fees going forward” and noted in his statement Jones had received $2.6 million in fees for her work as an independent monitor on Trump’s case

Trump mystery loan has been in the news before

This isn’t the first time Trump’s mysterious multi-million dollar loan to himself has made news headlines according to The Daily Beast. Trump’s loan came up in a 2016 interview with the New York Times and he explained the situation quite simply. 

“I have the mortgage… I am the bank”

“We don’t assess any value to it because we don’t care,” Trump explained at the time. “I have the mortgage. That is all there is. Very simple. I am the bank.” However, there may be very real consequences for his actions according to experts. 

More for you