Michael Cohen’s key testimony could make or break Trump’s hush money case

Cohen testified Monday
Considered a key witness
Election interference
“One of many times he operated on the benefit of Trump”
A meeting between Trump, Cohen and Weisselberg
“There's going to be a lot of women coming forward
“Several hush-money payments”
Buried a story about an affair between Trump and playmate Karen McDougal
Trump’s call to the National Enquirer publisher
A tricky piece of evidence
A problem with Cohen’s credibility
Weisselberg unlikely to testify
Jurors most trust Cohen alone
Boosting the prosecution’s case so far
Final judgement must wait after cross examination and a verdict
Cohen testified Monday
Michael Cohen (pictured), Trump’s former attorney, “fixer” and supporter turned Trump’s enemy and critic, testified Monday on the former president’s hush money trial in Manhattan.
Considered a key witness
Considered a key witness, Cohen was the one to make the hush money payment to adult actress Stormy Daniels at the centre of the case, a sum which the prosecution alleges was fraudulently reimbursed by Trump.
Election interference

Prosecutors charge that the payment, made in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign, and the subsequent attempt to conceal it by falsifying records qualifies as election interference.

“One of many times he operated on the benefit of Trump”

Cohen testified saying that the payment was “one of many times he operated at the direction of and for the benefit" of Trump, he said, according to a BBC report.

A meeting between Trump, Cohen and Weisselberg

When then-personal fixer Cohen met with Trump and his top financial officer, Allen Weisselberg (pictured), between the 2016 presidential election and inauguration, Weisselberg did the talking, Cohen recalled.

"This is gonna be one heck of a ride in DC"

Weisselberg explained to Cohen in front of Trump that he would be paid back in 12 instalments of $35,000, which would be accounted for as a retainer for legal services. He added that Trump "approved it" and then told him: "This is gonna be one heck of a ride in DC."

“There's going to be a lot of women coming forward"

Cohen also testified that Trump told him to "be prepared" for negative publicity after announcing his 2016 presidential bid. “There's going to be a lot of women coming forward," Trump allegedly said. 

Photo: writer E. Jean Carroll who won a defamation case against Trump.

“Several hush-money payments”

Moreover, Cohen said Trump instructed him to "handle" several hush-money payments, as well as liaise with tabloid media to silence negative stories that could threaten his political goals.

Photo: Stormy Daniels

Buried a story about an affair between Trump and playmate Karen McDougal

Cohen also testified that he worked with the National Enquirer tabloid to buy and bury a story about an alleged affair between Trump and Playboy model Karen McDougal (pictured).

 

 
Trump’s call to the National Enquirer publisher

Cohen said he was present for a call in which Trump asked National Enquirer publisher David Pecker (pictured) about a payment to McDougal and added that Pecker’s response was “we have this under control, we’ll take care of this”.

A tricky piece of evidence

Although Cohen’s testimony is key, it is also a tricky piece of evidence for prosecutors, because the jury may need to rely solely on Cohen’s account of it, according to ‘Politico’ analysts.

A problem with Cohen’s credibility

Cohen, who was convicted in 2018 to eight felony counts, including tax offences, fraud and campaign finance violations, is also an egotistical self confessed liar with anger management issues, Politico analysts say.

Weisselberg unlikely to testify

Moreover, the only other witness who was present in Cohen’s accounts, Allen Weisselberg, is currently serving jail time for perjury and appears unlikely to testify in the trial , Politico reported.

Jurors most trust Cohen alone

That means prosecutors need the 12 jurors to trust Cohen, and Cohen alone, on what really happened, while his history of lying might interfere with their decision.

Boosting the prosecution’s case so far

But according to Norm Eisen, an attorney who interviewed Cohen in 2019, his testimony so far has boosted the prosecution's case, he told the BBC.

Final judgement must wait after cross examination and a verdict

"I am sure the jury is surprised by the sober, well-spoken, candid individual they are meeting," Eisen said about Cohen. "Of course, final judgment must wait until after cross-examination and a verdict, but I think he is doing well so far," he added.

Never miss a story! Click here to follow The Daily Digest.

More for you