Will Ukraine become a nuclear power once again?

Tough questions about nuclear weapons
Zelensky face a difficult decision
A nuclear Ukraine isn’t a far-fetched idea
The third strongest nuclear power in the 1990s
Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal
Putin violated the Budapest Memorandum
Russia’s invasion will lead to nuclear proliferation
Triggering a resurgent interest in nuclear weapons
An idea put forth by Zelensky in September
NATO membership or nuclear weapons
Ukraine chooses NATO over nukes
Context for Zelensky’s remarks
A wave of speculation from the media
Ukraine isn’t building nuclear weapons
NATO membership on the backburner
Ukraine can no longer wait for NATO
The nuclear option is more possible than ever
Tough questions about nuclear weapons

The complex geopolitical landscape altered following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, notably after American voters re-elected Donald Trump as President. As Trump prepares to assume office in January, Ukraine is confronted with critical decisions regarding its nuclear rearmament strategy.

Zelensky face a difficult decision

The geopolitical landscape underwent significant changes after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent re-election of Donald Trump as President of the United States. As Trump is set to take office in January, Ukraine faces pivotal choices concerning its strategy on nuclear rearmament.

A nuclear Ukraine isn’t a far-fetched idea

The idea that Ukraine could become one of the few states that has nuclear weapons in its military arsenal isn’t far-fetched. Ukraine had one of the largest stockpiles of nuclear weapons after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s. 

The third strongest nuclear power in the 1990s

According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, Ukraine had roughly 1,900 strategic nuclear warheads and somewhere between 2,650 to 4,200 tactical nuclear weapons deployed to its territory at the time of its independence in 1991. 

Photo Credit: Wiki Commons By George Chernilevsky, Own Work, Public Domain

Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal

Ukraine quickly gave up its nuclear weapons, however. A deal known as the Budapest Memorandum saw Kyiv relinquish its nuclear stockpile in exchange for special security assurances from the United States and the United Kingdom.

Photo Credit: Wiki Commons By U.S. government Employee, William J. Clinton Presidential Library, Public Domain

Putin violated the Budapest Memorandum

Aldo Zammit Borda, Reader at City St George's, University of London, pointed out in a recent article on the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the Ukraine war for The Conversation that Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine violated the agreement. 

Russia’s invasion will lead to nuclear proliferation

In his article, Borda explained that Ukraine’s experience was likely to lead to nuclear proliferation globally since it might now be seen and legitimized as the only way to truly safeguard a nation’s sovereignty and independence. 

Triggering a resurgent interest in nuclear weapons

“The image of Ukraine being invaded by Russia despite its security assurances and being left largely to fend for itself in this conflict may trigger a resurgent interest in nuclear weapons,” Borda wrote. 

An idea put forth by Zelensky in September

The concept of nuclear weapons being one of the only means to safeguard a country was recently brought up by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who explained to reporters in October he had mentioned this to Trump during a September meeting. 

NATO membership or nuclear weapons

“Either Ukraine will have nuclear weapons and that will be our protection or we should have some sort of alliance,” Zelensky said he told Trump according to Politico. “Apart from NATO, today we do not know any effective alliances.”

Ukraine chooses NATO over nukes

“NATO countries are not at war. People are all alive in NATO countries. And thank God. That is why we choose NATO. Not nuclear weapons,” Zelensky added. 

Context for Zelensky’s remarks

The context for Zelensky’s remarks is important. He said he walked Trump through why NATO membership or nuclear weapons were the only means to secure Ukraine, citing the Budapest Memorandum and the failure of its security guarantees.  

A wave of speculation from the media

Zelensky’s comments led to a wave of speculation that Kyiv was already on its way to becoming a nuclear power, and the Ukrainian President clarified what he meant later the same day during a press conference with new NATO general Secretary Mark Rutte. 

Photo Credit: Wiki Commons By Michael, CC BY 3.0

Ukraine isn’t building nuclear weapons

“We are not building nuclear weapons. What I meant is that today there is no stronger security guarantee for us besides NATO membership,” Zelensky explained according to Foreign Policy. However, the calculus behind this decision has changed. 

NATO membership on the backburner

Trump’s reelection to the presidency could see Ukrainian NATO membership put on the back burner as the new president works to bring about his plan to end the war. This is something that Ukraine cannot afford according to the U.S. foreign policy magazine. 

Ukraine can no longer wait for NATO

“Ukraine no longer has the luxury of waiting for NATO membership,” Foreign Policy’s Casey Michel explained. 

The nuclear option is more possible than ever

“With every passing day, and especially with the reelection of Trump, the reality increasingly dawns that if we’re to guarantee Ukrainian statehood, the West must welcome Ukraine into NATO—or it must start getting ready for Ukraine to rejoin the same nuclear club it was once a part of all those years ago,” Michel concluded. 

Never miss a story! Click here to follow The Daily Digest.

More for you